- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

New PGP key
by Michal Trojnara 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

Dear Users, As of now I'm starting to sign my emails and code with a new PGP key. The new key is attached to this email message, and available at https://www.stunnel.org/pgp.asc Key fingerprint = AC91 5EA3 0645 D9D3 D4DA E4FE B104 8932 DD3A AAA3 The new key is also signed with my previous PGP key. This and other signatures can be verified with: gpg --check-sigs "AC91 5EA3 0645 D9D3 D4DA E4FE B104 8932 DD3A AAA3" Best regards, Mike

1 0

stunnel keeps using SSLv3 even after disabling it
by Or Yarimi 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

Hi, I'm using stunnel to communicate with FIX server. In order to do that, I disabled SSLv2 and SSLv3 and set the sslVersion to TLSv1. It seems like stunnel keeps trying using SSLv3 handshake, which isn't working. This is the configuration: client = yes debug = 7 output=stunnel.log cert = stunnel.pem ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 ; Turning for LMAX options = NO_SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv3 [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-Trading] sslVersion = TLSv1 accept = 40001 connect = fix-ate.lmaxtrader.com:443 stunnel log: 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: Service [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-MktData] started 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG5[12516]: Service [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-MktData] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:59475 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG6[12516]: s_connect: connecting 91.215.165.69:443 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 91.215.165.69:443: waiting 10 seconds 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG5[12516]: s_connect: connected 91.215.165.69:443 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG5[12516]: Service [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-MktData] connected remote server from 10.0.0.62:59476 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: Remote socket (FD=620) initialized 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG6[12516]: SNI: sending servername: fix-md-ate.lmaxtrader.com 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A Already burned around 4 hours understanding what I'm doing wrong, will be glad if you could help me. Thanks in advance, Or. -- *Attention:* This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and delete the original message from your system without making a copy. This e-mail is attributed to the sender and does not necessarily reflect the view of Markets Pulse P.S. Ltd. or any affiliate. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

1 0

Can't compile stunnel 5.10 on Linux ... got fatal signal 11 error
by amontaron 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Hi everybody ! I tried to compile stunnel 5.10 (latest) on my old Suse 7 Linux distrib and got "a fatal signal 11 error message" when doing the make command. Just before, openssl 1.0.2 (latest) compile fine with no errors. Also, I add some stuffs like xemacs 21.4.22 (latest) just to say that that rather old distrib is able to do all that :-D So, here is the latest messages from make I got : > Making all in src > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make all-am > make[2]: Entering directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > source='stunnel.c' object='stunnel-stunnel.o' libtool=no \ > DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../auto/depcomp \ > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/kerberos/include > -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DLIBDIR='"/usr/local/lib/stunnel"' > -DCONFDIR='"/usr/local/etc/stunnel"' -g -O2 -pthread -Wall > -Wformat=2 -Wconversion -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated-declarations > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c -o stunnel-stunnel.o `test -f 'stunnel.c' || > echo './'`stunnel.c > In file included from /usr/include/string.h:346, > from common.h:201, > from stunnel.c:38: > /usr/include/bits/string2.h: In function `__strsep_g': > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 2 of > `__strpbrk_c2' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 3 of > `__strpbrk_c2' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 2 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 3 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 4 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > make[2]: *** [stunnel-stunnel.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Previously got lots of warning messages. Perhaps need "make report" also ? I've look at stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org mail archive up to July 2011 with no success. So, that's why I'm writting to you there... Then, I tried different versions of stunnel 4.xx like 4.00, 4.56, 4.28 and more. All simply don't compile with differents errors messages. The only one I could compile completly is stunnel 3.22 (so latest 3.xx) Note that I'm happy with that because I was running stunnel 3.3 just before and that everything works with the latest openssl version I download and everything works fine for what I would ! Remark: Suse7 distrib (not OpenSuse) is Linux 2.2.16 kernel (not latest :-D) Alex. PS: Another things, on the same machine I ran stunnel 4.56 on (old) Windows 98 with no problems. --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com

2 2

stunnel log shows SSLv3 protocol level even when TLSv1 was negotiated
by christian.tenvenne＠lhsystems.com 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

I'm running stunnel in server-mode with options "NO_SSLV2" and "NO_SSLV3" and sslVersion=all. My client also explicitly disables SSLv2 and SSLv3. My client's ssl-log (-Djavax.net.debug=ssl) confirms that, during handshake and for application data, the highest TLS protocol version is being used. How come, stunnel log still shows "SSLv3" ? 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG5[8415:140561397376768]: ldaps-in accepted connection from X.X.X.X:65158 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server done A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client key exchange A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 9 items in the session cache 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 client connects that finished 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 12 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 9 server connects that finished 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 session cache hits 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 external session cache hits 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 session cache misses 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 session cache timeouts 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG6[8415:140561397376768]: SSL accepted: new session negotiated 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG6[8415:140561397376768]: Negotiated ciphers: AES128-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(128) Mac=SHA1 Is my client's ssl-log wrong? Or stunnel's? Kind regards, Christian Tenvenne

2 1

issue with stunnel forwarding
by David 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

I am trying to configure stunnel on a bridge server which needs to use ssl to talk to 3 others servers. below is my conf file: ; ***************************************** Example SSL server mode services [ xyz ] accept=10.10.10.74:9908 connect= 127.0.0.10:1040 transparent = source[ hp ] accept=10.10.10.218:9904 connect=127.0.0.10:1041 transparent = source[ sql] accept=10.10.10.214:59053 connect=127.0.0.10:1042 transparent = source when I run the stunnel GUI start I get following message: [ ] No limit detected for the number of clients [.] stunnel 5.10 on x86-pc-msvc-1500 platform [.] Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.1l 15 Jan 2015 [.] Threading:WIN32 Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI [ ] errno: (*_errno()) [.] Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf [ ] GUI message loop initialized [.] UTF-8 byte order mark detected [ ] Enabling support for engine "capi" [ ] Initializing engine #1 (capi) [ ] Engine #1 (capi) initialized [.] FIPS mode disabled [ ] Compression disabled [ ] Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd [ ] Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd [ ] PRNG seeded successfully [!] Line 62: "transparent = source": Specified option name is not valid here[!] Server is down what am I missing here? thanks! nazja2015

2 1

stunnel-5.10, FreeBsd Package building, missing openssl and perl packages and config menue for Stunnel is missing ssl port
by mugetsu shinde 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

so ive noticed in the previous stunnel 5.07 i was able to select SSL_PORT when making the config for Stunnel , well now after downloading stunnel 5.10 with FreeBsd 10.1 over portsnap fetch extract , Stunnel is missing the option: SSL_PORT why , whats going on ? btw ive noticed openssl and perl arent downloaded from the portsnap server either apparently , help please , i need this for my pfsense 2.2 release vm to work with Stunnel again

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi Mike, thanks for your fast response, but I think there is a big issue. The latest version that is available in the CENTOS 6 Base Repo is "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64" - In this version the SSLv3 is disabled by default, but there is not option to enable it. I hope you understand my situation :-) ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 11:44 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, My documentation describes the latest version of stunnel. For an old version please refer to the appropriate manual page distributed with the specific version you're using. Mike On 29.01.2015 11:40, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:stunnel-users@stunnel.org> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi Mike, yes your correct, but I have forced the installation with "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_4.x86_64" ( all other packages openssl, etc. updated) and SSLv3 is working again. So, for my understanding there must be a bug or they have disabled SSLv3 in version "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64". Regards, Sebastian. ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:12 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, The ChangeLog does not say anything about disabling SSLv3: http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/centos/updates/6.6/x86_64/Packages/stunnel-4.2… I guess it may be disabled in the OpenSSL rather than in stunnel. Anyway, if you connect stunnel with some software that's so old that it doesn't support TLS, the software is almost certainly no longer supported, and most likely vulnerable to attacks. This is a serious risk! Mike On 29.01.2015 11:58, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi Mike, thanks for your fast response, but I think there is a big issue. The latest version that is available in the CENTOS 6 Base Repo is "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64" - In this version the SSLv3 is disabled by default, but there is not option to enable it. I hope you understand my situation :-) ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org><mailto:stunnel-users-bounces@stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net><mailto:Michal.Trojnara@mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 11:44 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:stunnel-users@stunnel.org> Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, My documentation describes the latest version of stunnel. For an old version please refer to the appropriate manual page distributed with the specific version you're using. Mike On 29.01.2015 11:40, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:stunnel-users@stunnel.org> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 0

Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian.

1 0

Blue Iris
by Patrick wickline 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

I have stunnel set up on my machine. It works locally and lets me connect to my Blue Iris server with https. However, I am unable to do this remotely. I have forwarded the port in my router to stunnel, from stunnel to blue iris, but still doesn't work. Below is part of my conf file [Blue Iris] accept = 8344 (forwarded this in the router to my static IP of my machine) connect = 127.0.0.1:8081 (8081 is my blue iris web server) I hope someone is able to give some advice

2 1