Stunnel and CAPI engine: Issues after OpenSSL upgrade on server side
It looks like IBM might have been able to get MS CAPI to work with TLS1.2. That said, I think it would make more sense to switch to CNG API.
Thanks Brent, Have you got some reference to mentioned IBM's achievement? Kind regards, Mikhail On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 01:23 Brent Kimberley <brent_kimberley@rogers.com> wrote:
It looks like IBM might have been able to get MS CAPI to work with TLS1.2. That said, I think it would make more sense to switch to CNG API. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list -- stunnel-users@stunnel.org To unsubscribe send an email to stunnel-users-leave@stunnel.org
google: "IBM MS CAPI TLS 1.2" I suspect there was some sleight of hand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleight_of_hand On Thursday, December 10, 2020, 3:35:56 a.m. EST, Michael S. Chusovitin <tchuss@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Brent, Have you got some reference to mentioned IBM's achievement? Kind regards,Mikhail On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 01:23 Brent Kimberley <brent_kimberley@rogers.com> wrote: It looks like IBM might have been able to get MS CAPI to work with TLS1.2. That said, I think it would make more sense to switch to CNG API. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list -- stunnel-users@stunnel.org To unsubscribe send an email to stunnel-users-leave@stunnel.org
participants (2)
-
Brent Kimberley -
Michael S. Chusovitin