Re: [stunnel-users] X-Forwarded-For

Tom Shaw wrote:

Any possibility of getting

X-Forwarded-For

incorporated into the baseline?

I reviewed some patches for this functionality, and they were vulnerable to buffer overflows resulting in remote code execution. They also didn't support keep-alive-mechanism of HTTP/1.1. Some day I'm could add this functionality. The functionality is on my TODO list, anyway: http://stunnel.mirt.net/?page=todo_sdf Best regards, Mike