- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

make_test failing
by Ian Bamforth 16 Apr '18

16 Apr '18

Morning, Our CI has been failing since Friday with the same errors seen at https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/stunnel4…. make_test fails on 012_verify_chain and 013_CRL_file. Anyone else seeing the same thing? We run Ubuntu 14.04, stunnel v5.44, automatically applying apt security patches to the OS. My initial assumption is that some dependency of stunnel has been updated, but I've not had chance to find out. We have been using the same version of stunnel since the day it was released without any other problems. Ian

2 2

Invalid certificate in tests, prevents make_test from running
by Ian Bamforth 16 Apr '18

16 Apr '18

Morning, I posted earlier about `make_test` failing, apologies for not replying to that thread but I didn't receive the email myself. I've tracked this down to `tests/certs/CACert.pem` containing an expired certificate - see below output: openssl x509 -in tests/certs/CACert.pem -text -noout Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 1 (0x1) Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption Issuer: C=pl, O=CA_cert, OU=CA_cert, CN=CA_cert/emailAddress=CA_cert(a)example.com Validity Not Before: Apr 26 18:41:00 2017 GMT Not After : Apr 13 15:45:00 2018 GMT Subject: C=pl, O=CA_cert, OU=CA_cert, CN=CA_cert/emailAddress=CA_cert(a)example.com Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption Public-Key: (2048 bit) Modulus: 00:af:cc:61:f5:73:2b:49:3c:62:c0:b0:d6:1b:0f: 5e:32:d1:49:48:01:b2:35:36:a8:04:a3:e0:7e:e4: 1d:f9:cb:fe:11:0a:c3:2e:b1:3e:87:4c:b0:72:d7: 73:04:ba:28:c7:2b:b4:67:13:0e:5d:05:7f:67:bd: ba:7f:c5:89:b0:48:d6:21:4b:e8:3a:70:ac:dc:e4: f5:43:c3:c9:57:7f:73:f1:3b:b0:e5:a5:90:44:9f: 6e:c3:2a:f5:ab:e6:15:f3:de:cd:44:23:5e:4f:c2: eb:44:59:6c:f5:76:46:b0:7c:fc:59:df:20:97:0c: 0f:43:ae:df:47:f6:d2:78:fd:c6:be:11:cf:26:a1: 8d:87:74:2f:c9:b5:1b:2b:9d:a4:95:44:0c:54:de: 0c:12:d4:8d:14:57:31:a7:a8:70:11:68:6e:20:3d: 76:c9:c8:45:50:d5:4e:2f:f1:6e:78:25:23:05:45: 6e:7d:11:2a:b3:e8:88:6e:68:29:2c:a2:c2:3d:cf: 41:50:b5:e1:51:8f:8e:f4:36:0f:f5:a8:63:5e:29: 1d:b4:fe:71:43:d0:2a:be:2a:2c:b1:62:c6:b9:bc: 4d:95:80:4e:60:ec:e9:79:92:19:31:9c:b2:00:74: 3b:a1:80:57:b4:22:45:c8:d3:1a:a7:4f:f6:00:12: 35:b7 Exponent: 65537 (0x10001) X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Basic Constraints: CA:TRUE Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption 97:03:b2:c1:a2:44:8a:2a:9c:1d:3c:cb:61:a6:f9:bc:7f:4f: 21:fc:69:d8:f3:31:7b:4b:e5:2b:34:42:19:03:1a:40:af:fa: 7e:18:93:99:a8:78:cb:32:15:23:75:6e:49:6d:ac:ee:ca:5e: d6:d2:69:5a:b5:4a:13:cd:7c:77:e4:f2:6d:a0:2d:63:2f:62: b5:be:24:ee:12:d7:22:3e:dd:d2:56:07:81:ca:c4:cf:4c:2c: 36:64:32:52:b1:76:76:5f:c7:45:86:b9:34:1a:c7:37:0c:38: ce:8b:20:8b:70:a1:33:a0:e1:3d:ed:9a:26:c0:04:e7:35:c5: 41:ab:bd:f9:cc:10:8d:12:3f:7a:ee:b3:a3:98:35:09:b2:e5: 5f:aa:22:16:7e:18:df:61:ac:3d:30:48:f7:77:41:5c:25:bd: 6f:dc:53:d0:f3:d7:cc:33:f6:77:36:99:0b:e4:8f:3e:83:e4: ca:3a:58:6f:73:55:83:6e:a7:01:b2:21:bf:09:54:28:e3:e0: a5:4f:bd:d7:66:a2:f8:c2:81:6f:0d:aa:ba:6f:7d:a9:cf:6f: 06:a8:a2:b1:5b:3b:f9:7b:89:bf:f5:c4:ed:f0:5e:cf:64:87: 39:84:90:6c:c9:e0:5d:b4:54:ae:a7:6c:e7:b4:2a:29:fe:ab: 62:4f:91:d0 As a (horrible) workaround I've had to skip "make_test" in my CI - if there are any better ideas please let me know! Ian

1 0

Possible memory leak with stunnel reload
by Mark Brookes 06 Apr '18

06 Apr '18

Hi all, we have noticed that when reloading (note reloading not restarting) stunnel it appears to be leaking between 12 and 32 bytes of memory (ish) per reload. There does not need to be any traffic passing through it at the time to view this problem. If its reloaded enough times the system will eventually run out of memory. Unless an stunnel restart if performed inbetween. We are running 5.41 tried with the latest 5.44 and have the same result. We are using openssl 1.0.2j-fips ive tried with 1.0.2n and 1.1.0e (to try and rule out openssl) We are reloading by running: kill -s HUP <pid> The stunnel configuration is - pid = /var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid debug = 7 syslog = no output = /var/log/stunnel.log socket = a:IP_FREEBIND=yes fips = no sslVersion = all [VIP_Name] cert = /etc/loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem ciphers = ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA:AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:!RC4:!MD5:!aNULL:!EDH:!3DES accept = 192.168.80.16:443 connect = 127.0.0.5:80 delay = yes options = NO_SSLv3 options = NO_TLSv1 options = DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS renegotiation = no local = 192.168.80.16 TIMEOUTclose = 0 The stunnel log file is as follows - 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Clients allowed=62937 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG5[ui]: stunnel 5.44 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG5[ui]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.2j-fips 26 Sep 2016 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG5[ui]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: errno: (*__errno_location ()) 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG5[ui]: Reading configuration from file /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG5[ui]: UTF-8 byte order mark not detected 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG5[ui]: FIPS mode disabled 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Compression disabled 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /dev/urandom 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: PRNG seeded successfully 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG6[ui]: Initializing service [VIP_Name] 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Ciphers: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA:AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:!RC4:!MD5:!aNULL:!EDH:!3DES 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: TLS options: 0x07004804 (+0x07004800, -0x00000000) 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG6[ui]: Loading certificate from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG6[ui]: Certificate loaded from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG6[ui]: Loading private key from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG6[ui]: Private key loaded from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Private key check succeeded 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: ECDH initialization 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG5[ui]: Configuration successful 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Binding service [VIP_Name] 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Listening file descriptor created (FD=6) 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Option IP_FREEBIND set on accept socket 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[ui]: Service [VIP_Name] (FD=6) bound to 192.168.80.16:443 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[main]: Created pid file /var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid 2018.04.03 11:09:59 LOG7[cron]: Cron thread initialized 2018.04.03 11:10:59 LOG6[cron]: Executing cron jobs 2018.04.03 11:10:59 LOG6[cron]: Cron jobs completed in 0 seconds 2018.04.03 11:10:59 LOG7[cron]: Waiting 86400 seconds 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: FD=6 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Processing SIGNAL_RELOAD_CONFIG 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG5[main]: Reading configuration from file /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG5[main]: UTF-8 byte order mark not detected 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG5[main]: FIPS mode disabled 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Compression disabled 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /dev/urandom 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: PRNG seeded successfully 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG6[main]: Initializing service [VIP_Name] 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Ciphers: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA:AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:!RC4:!MD5:!aNULL:!EDH:!3DES 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: TLS options: 0x07004804 (+0x07004800, -0x00000000) 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG6[main]: Loading certificate from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG6[main]: Certificate loaded from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG6[main]: Loading private key from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG6[main]: Private key loaded from file: /etc/ loadbalancer.org/certs/server.pem 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Private key check succeeded 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: ECDH initialization 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG5[main]: Configuration successful 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Unbinding service [VIP_Name] 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Service [VIP_Name] closed (FD=6) 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Service [VIP_Name] closed 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Binding service [VIP_Name] 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Listening file descriptor created (FD=6) 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Option IP_FREEBIND set on accept socket 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Service [VIP_Name] (FD=6) bound to 192.168.80.16:443 2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Signal pipe is empty Any help would be appreciated. Thanks -- Mark Brookes Loadbalancer.org Ltd. www.loadbalancer.org +44 (0)330 380 1064 mark(a)loadbalancer.org

2 2

Motion and Stunnel Query
by Vidya Govindan 04 Apr '18

04 Apr '18

Hi Everyone, I am trying to work on a video streaming project which uses the motion software to stream images from a usb camera. By default the streaming is done in a non-secure manner. So I installed Stunnel , generated a self signed certificate and I am not using it on top of the motion software to securely stream images. Now, I want to know exactly how Stunnel encrypts/decrypts image data that is generated by motion? I know that motion sends the data on port 8081 and Stunnel tunnels it to another port 8443. I can not understand where exactly the Openssl library functions are used to add the security feature in this scenario. Can anyone with a better understanding throw some light on the same? Thanks & Regards, Vidya

1 0

proxy with authentication
by Andreas Meier 03 Apr '18

03 Apr '18

3 3

First Time Troubles.
by me＠kilosierracharlie.me 22 Mar '18

22 Mar '18

Hello All, I'm trying to configure STunnel4 on Windows to connect to my VPS installed with STunnel, so I can use SSH through a DPI laden network. The configuration works if I try at home, or on a mobile data hotspot, but if I attempt within the DPI network, it does not work, and provides this console output: 2018.03.22 09:30:15 LOG5[main]: stunnel 5.44 on x86-pc-msvc-1500 platform 2018.03.22 09:30:15 LOG5[main]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.2m-fips 2 Nov 2017 2018.03.22 09:30:15 LOG5[main]: Threading:WIN32 Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI 2018.03.22 09:30:15 LOG5[main]: Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf 2018.03.22 09:30:15 LOG5[main]: UTF-8 byte order mark detected 2018.03.22 09:30:15 LOG5[main]: FIPS mode disabled 2018.03.22 09:30:15 LOG5[main]: Configuration successful 2018.03.22 09:30:24 LOG5[0]: Service [ssh] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:65086 2018.03.22 09:30:24 LOG5[0]: s_connect: connected 130.185.251.28:443 2018.03.22 09:30:24 LOG5[0]: Service [ssh] connected remote server from 172.28.1.25:65087 2018.03.22 09:30:25 LOG4[0]: CERT: Certificate not found in local repository 2018.03.22 09:30:25 LOG4[0]: Rejected by CERT at depth=0: CN=130.185.251.28 2018.03.22 09:30:25 LOG3[0]: SSL_connect: 14090086: error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate verify failed 2018.03.22 09:30:25 LOG5[0]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket This is the configuration I'm using: [ssh] client = yes accept = 443 connect = 130.185.251.28:443 CAfile = peer-ssh.pem verifyPeer = yes The odd thing, is that if I connect using my mobile data, and then switch over to filtered internet and try again, it works fine, and adds the following lines to the log: 2018.03.22 09:36:46 LOG5[1]: Service [ssh] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:65237 2018.03.22 09:36:46 LOG5[1]: s_connect: connected 130.185.251.28:443 2018.03.22 09:36:46 LOG5[1]: Service [ssh] connected remote server from 192.168.43.115:65238 2018.03.22 09:36:46 LOG5[1]: Certificate accepted at depth=0: C=GB, ST=Lincolnshire, L=Horncastle, O=N/A, OU=N/A, CN=personal.kilosierracharlie.me, emailAddress=webmaster(a)kilosierracharlie.me Has anyone got any ideas regarding this issue? It's not mission critical, but it's quite annoyingly repetitive! Cheers, Kieran.

1 0

sTunnel client connecting to load balanced URL - stunnel 5.02 on x86-pc-msvc-1500 platform
by Tony 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Hi all, I have a situation where I'm trying to use sTunnel as the client to connect to a service on a secure URL, but the hiccup is that the secure URL is load balanced. If a do an nslookup on the URL, the response comes back as it being an alias. Non-authoritative answer: Name: eu1571393051174.ssl.ondemand.com Address: 155.56.210.164 Aliases: l4884-iflmap.hcisbp.eu1.hana.ondemand.com Looking at the sTunnel log, it resolves to the IP of the server. But the IP itself does not host the service so I'm getting http:503 errors. 2018.03.16 14:44:44 LOG7[18796]: Service [ssl-OSRdev] (FD=564) bound to 0.0.0.0:8085 2018.03.16 14:44:55 LOG7[18796]: Service [ssl-OSRdev] accepted (FD=572) from 192.168.0.22:61093 2018.03.16 14:44:55 LOG7[18796]: Creating a new thread 2018.03.16 14:44:55 LOG7[18796]: New thread created 2018.03.16 14:44:55 LOG7[30864]: Service [ssl-OSRdev] started 2018.03.16 14:44:55 LOG5[30864]: Service [ssl-OSRdev] accepted connection from 192.168.0.22:61093 2018.03.16 14:44:55 LOG6[30864]: s_connect: connecting 155.56.210.164:443 2018.03.16 14:44:55 LOG7[30864]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 155.56.210.164:443: waiting 10 seconds 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG5[30864]: s_connect: connected 155.56.210.164:443 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG5[30864]: Service [ssl-OSRdev] connected remote server from 192.168.0.32:30269 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: Remote socket (FD=588) initialized 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SNI: sending servername: l4884-iflmap.hcisbp.eu1.hana.ondemand.com 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv2/v3 write client hello A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server key exchange A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate request A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server done A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client certificate A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client key exchange A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write certificate verify A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2018.03.16 14:44:56 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 1 items in the session cache 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 1 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 1 client connects that finished 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 server connects that finished 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 session cache hits 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 external session cache hits 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 session cache misses 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: 0 session cache timeouts 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG7[30864]: Peer certificate was cached (3826 bytes) 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG6[30864]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG6[30864]: Negotiated TLSv1/SSLv3 ciphersuite: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128-bit encryption) 2018.03.16 14:44:57 LOG6[30864]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG6[30864]: SSL socket closed (SSL_read) 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: Sent socket write shutdown 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG5[30864]: Connection closed: 1730 byte(s) sent to SSL, 274 byte(s) sent to socket 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: Remote socket (FD=588) closed 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: Local socket (FD=572) closed 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: Service [ssl-OSRdev] finished (0 left) 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: str_stats: 3 block(s), 4294962489 data byte(s), 150 control byte(s) 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: str_stats: 20 byte(s) at ..\src\network.c:413 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: str_stats: 20 byte(s) at ..\src\network.c:412 2018.03.16 14:44:58 LOG7[30864]: str_stats: 20 byte(s) at ..\src\network.c:411 I have tested the service using SoapUI and it works. Is it possible to have sTunnel follow the URL redirection? Regards, Tony

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] basic usage question
by Mark Foley 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Solved! I've fixed up the various ports and now I am able to connect. For the edification of other list readers I'll summarize. I have a local Linux host acting as firewall/router. It routes requests on port 1234 to port 3389 on a local Linux workstation which is running x11vnc server listening on its local port 5900. I want to connect to this VNC server from a remote vnc viewer. (Why does the router forward to port 3389? Because the workstaion can dual-boot Windows, so the forward works regardless of booted OS.) Remote vnc viewer, stunnel client stunnel.conf: verify = 2 pid = /home/mfoley/.stunnel/stunnel.pid CAfile = /home/mfoley/.stunnel/certificate.pem client = yes [x11vnc] accept = 5900 connect = router.obfuscate.org:1234 Local workstation vnc server, stunnel server stunnel.conf: pid = /var/run/stunnel.pid debug = 7 [x11vnc] accept = 3389 key = /root/privatekey.pem cert = /root/certificate.pem connect = 127.0.0.1:5900 The certificate is self-signed and created on the stunnel/vnc server host using the following commands: openssl genrsa -out privatekey.pem 2048 openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -key privatekey.pem -out certificate.pem The certificate.pem is copied to the stunnel client host. With x11vnc listening on 5900 on the local workstation and with 'stunnel stunnel.conf' running on both stunnel client (as the normal user) and server hosts, I use the remote vnc viewer, logged in as a normal user, with the connection 127.0.0.1:5900 I'm guessing I could configure my vnc viewers to connect to multiple clients with difference [service] sections, for example: verify = 2 pid = /home/mfoley/.stunnel/stunnel.pid CAfile = /home/mfoley/.stunnel/certificate.pem client = yes [remoteHost1] accept = 5900 connect = router.obfuscate.org:1234 [remoteHost2] accept = 5901 connect = router.obfuscate.org:4321 I haven't tried that, but I will. I futher guess that I could have different CAfiles per server if I moved that directive to the respective service defintions (can someone confirm?), but I haven't tried that either. Thanks especially to Flo Rance for helping me work through this. Now, I have to figure out how to do this from a Windows client! --Mark

2 1

Creating CSR for GoDaddy
by John McClymont 15 Mar '18

15 Mar '18

Good Morning, As a novice user of stunnel. I use stunnel to make and encrypted video connection to home security system. I wish to create an SSL certificate request to obtain an SSL from GoDaddy I use the following command openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -nodes -keyout c:\key\private_key.key -out c:\key\request.csr Is this correct? thanks in advance for suggestions

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] basic usage question
by Mark Foley 14 Mar '18

14 Mar '18

Nitin - sorry, I didn't realize this was a response to my message and I sent a followup message before reading this one. I have your patch in a previous message. I'm not familiar with "patching". Can you give me quickie instructions on doing that, or refer me to a link that explains it? I assume I need to patch the source code, right? If so, I have stunnel version 5.35. Do I need to apply this patch to a more recent version? Are there any other sslVersions stunnel supports? Thanks --Mark -----Original Message----- On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:21:24 +0400 Nitin Mutkawoa <jmutkawoa(a)hackers.mu> wrote: > > hello > > Sorry, I was not clear enough in my previous mail. > The patch allows you to specify TLS 1.3 in the configuration file and do a > TLS 1.3 only. > > regards > > Nitin J Mutkawoa > > https://tunnelix.com > https://hackers.mu > > Twitter: @TheTunnelix > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Ma??gorzata Olszówka < > Malgorzata.Olszowka(a)stunnel.org> wrote: > > > I'm also working on TLS 1.3 compatibility with Stunnel. I will reach the > >> mailing list as soon as possible with a tested patch. > >> > > > > Hello Nitin, > > Could you specify what problem do you have with TLS 1.3. > > It works for me: > > > > 2018.03.13 11:39:06 LOG5[ui]: stunnel 5.44 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > > platform > > 2018.03.13 11:39:06 LOG5[ui]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL > > 1.1.1-pre2-dev xx XXX xxxx > > ??? > > 2018.03.13 11:39:23 LOG6[0]: Negotiated TLSv1.3 ciphersuite > > TLS13-AES-256-GCM-SHA384 (256-bit encryption) > > > > > > Regards, > > Ma??gorzata > > _______________________________________________ > > stunnel-users mailing list > > stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > >

1 1