- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

SSL_read: ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:308: error:0A000126:SSL routines::unexpected eof while reading
by carango＠ingeniocarmelita.com 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello I have the same problem, any solution? SSL_read: ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:308: error:0A000126:SSL routines::unexpected eof while reading

1 0

32-bit windows download
by Ágnes Kakasi 27 Sep '22

27 Sep '22

Hi, I'm looking for help to download and install Stunnel on a laptop with 32-bit Windows 7. I have downloaded the available download file from the website (stunnel-5.66-win64-installer.exe) but the computer indicates it cannot open the file. I tried to find info on this and in the platform sections I found Stunnel can run on 32-bit, as well, but I don't know how to make it work. Can you please advise me on what the correct download file is and how to install it so that it works on this computer? Thank you in advance. Agnes

2 1

error:0A000438:SSL routines::tlsv1 alert internal error
by johannwang＠ami.com 21 Sep '22

21 Sep '22

Hello, I am trying to use the xvncviewer on Ubuntu by VNC over stunnel, it will connect failed and print "xvncviewer: read: Connection reset by peer". The LOG on VNC server is here: 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: SNI: no virtual services defined 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3/TLS read client hello 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3/TLS write server hello 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3/TLS write certificate 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3/TLS write key exchange 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3/TLS write certificate request 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3/TLS write server done 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: TLS alert (read): fatal: internal error 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG3[1]: SSL_accept: ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1584: error:0A000438:SSL routines::tlsv1 alert internal error 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG5[1]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2012.01.01 00:21:58 LOG7[1]: Service [vnc] finished (0 left) I am running Stunnel 5.63 Here is the configuration currently: stunnel.conf on VNC client: cert = /home/server.pem key = /home/privkey.pem [VNC] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:5901 connect = 172.31.100.121:5901 sslVersion = all verifyChain = yes CAfile = /home/server.pem checkIP = 172.31.100.121 stunnel.conf on VNC server: cert = /conf/server.pem ;key = /conf/certs/privkey.pem setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /var/run/stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = a:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 foreground = yes client = no ciphers=AES256-SHA256:!RC4:HIGH:!MD5:!aNULL:!EDH:!AESGCM sslVersion = TLSv1.2 [vnc] accept = :::5901 connect = 5900 verify = 3 CAfile = /conf/server.pem Is this something I can remedy from the configuration, or is this something that requires modification? Thank you Johan

1 0

v5.66: failing test 081
by Andreas Vetter 20 Sep '22

20 Sep '22

Hi, in open build system I get the following failing test, when building and testing stunnel 5.66: [ 45s] 081. Test IPv6 support [ 45s] [client] Read '2022.09.15 21:17:15 LOG6[0]: TLS fd: Connection reset by peer (104)' [ 45s] ...................................................................... failed Is this a stunnel problem or a problem with logging inside the build system? What can I do to get more verbose information during build? The test is working for a similar target OS (openSUSE_Tumbleweed) and not for this one (openSUSE:Factory). The difference is small, but sometimes not neglectible: openSUSE:Factory is the to be tested submissions, always in the flow. openSUSE_Tumbleweed is a tested working snapshot of Factory. Best regards, Andreas

1 1

stunnel 5.66 released
by Michał Trojnara 11 Sep '22

11 Sep '22

Dear Users, I have released version 5.66 of stunnel. ### Version 5.66, 2022.09.11, urgency: MEDIUM * New features - OpenSSL 3.0 FIPS Provider support for Windows. * Bugfixes - Fixed building on machines without pkg-config. - Added the missing "environ" declaration for BSD-based operating systems. - Fixed the passphrase dialog with OpenSSL 3.0. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: 558178704d1aa5f6883aac6cc5d6bbf2a5714c8a0d2e91da0392468cee9f579c stunnel-5.66.tar.gz 5fccb2e4db0d2e3c1adb26c3906585ac545baf88226f4f539b2dc43fe418a3ef stunnel-5.66-win64-installer.exe 3b1e30e060e16f6aa9a8ad1b1a6ba1210c165bf76bd01e4734cb4537e0717c09 stunnel-5.66-android.zip Best regards, Mike

1 0

Stunnel Consulting
by Gary Jackson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

I am looking for someone to assist with an stunnel configuration on windows that will accept TLS1.2 connections and then send them unencrypted to an IP and port. I would need to get it working within the next week or so and am available most times if scheduled. Thank you. Gary Jackson Sent from my mobile

2 1

TLS 1.2 traffic on STunnel
by Gary Jackson 08 Sep '22

08 Sep '22

Good afternoon, I am trying to use Stunnel to accept traffic from a custom application using TLS 1.2 and a self signed cert and then send it to a back end application unencrypted. I want the configuration to only affect one listener on Stunnel and not all incoming ports. I am using Stunnel v.5.6 I am confused with all the documentation and what needs to be set in the config file for this use case. The config file currently has connections where it accepts traffic on one port and then directs it to another port internally but not with TLS 1.2. Thank you for all your knowledge and insight! _________________________________ Gary Jackson | Senior Systems Engineer

2 1

Certificate Request's "Distinguished Names" list is empty when using CAPath (but not when using CAFile)
by david.rundqvist＠gmail.com 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Hi, If I hash the client certificates and put them in a folder (with file names <hash>.0), and use the CAPath parameter on the server, together with verify=3, the server's Certificate Request message contains an empty list of "Distinguished Names". However, if I put the client certificates concatenated in a .pem file, and use the CAFile parameter on the server, the Certificate Request message does contain the Distinguished Names. Is this the correct behavior? I thought CAFile and CAPath worked more or less in the same way, but perhaps the Certificate Request message is implemented differently, depending on if you use CAFile or CAPath? My preferred way is to use CAPath: Is there some way I can get the Distinguished Names not to be empty, when using CAPath? I'm on Windows, using stunnel version 5.49, currently. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, /David

2 1

looking to pay for stunnel support
by jkorman＠pcvisions1.com 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

I have an issue with a program that is 9 years old that uses old stunnel for email forwarding of automated alerts. I would gladly pay for support for assistance configuring the newest version of stunnel. My issue is that present configuration is sending smtp at tls 1.0 which is getting rejected. Please send me your info via email and I will promptly respond Joe Korman

1 0

FIPS-enabled Windows installer of stunnel
by Vadim Loevski 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

Hi, I would appreciate it if you let me know how I could obtain a FIPS-enabled Windows 64 bit installer of stunnel. Regards, Vadim

1 0