September 2014 - stunnel-users

GnuTLS port
by Max 20 Sep '14

20 Sep '14

Pardon if that was asked before, but are there port of stunnel to GnuTLS available somewhere? With recent fallout from heartbleed I'm looking into getting rid of openssl (besides I've never liked the license anyway :) and stunnel is one of the very few programs which got dependency on it. cheers, Max.

2 1

stunnel beta (5.04b2) is available for testing
by Michal Trojnara 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Guys, Please feel free to try the second beta version: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads/beta/stunnel-5.04b2.tar.gz https://www.stunnel.org/downloads/beta/stunnel-5.04b2-installer.exe I have finished implementing Win32 UNICODE support. The following planned features depend on UNICODE support: - Non-ASCII path names (this is already partially implemented) - UTF8 stunnel.conf - Windows CE GUI stunnel 5.04b2 also fixes missing taskbar icon when stunnel is executed with commandline switches (for example "stunnel -help"). Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQcnAcACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtHOnQCeJFPogmAyhDFQ+CoLT17nhd1I CSIAni1tOnInyScnXwB/d876RF0o9YYt =PJ+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

400 - Bad Request
by j nasty 17 Sep '14

17 Sep '14

I'm trying to access a web service endpoint using sTunnel to handle all the SSL traffic. For my other connection setups this works perfectly fine. But for this one particular client I'm getting a 400 - Bad Request Error. Client Configuration looks like this: [Connection1] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:9006 connect = server.com:443 Response I get back is: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>400 Bad Request</title> </head><body> <h1>Bad Request</h1> <p>Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.<br /> Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port.<br /> Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please.<br /> <blockquote>Hint: <a href="https://server.com/"><b>https://server.com/</b></a></blockquote></p> </body></html> Is there a setting configuration I can use so that sTunnel redirects to https://server.com instead of server.com:443? Thanks in advance, Jake

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel Windows Server 2008 R2
by Pierre DELAAGE 31 Aug '14

31 Aug '14

Ok, thank you very much. I am pushing our mails to the forum, just in case it may help someone. Yours sincerely Pierre Le 01/09/2014 00:53, 541401(a)gmail.com a écrit : > Sorry for my lack of clarity. > > Your patched 5.02 works as a service. The official 5.03 does not work > as a service. > > > On 31.Aug.14 15:13, Pierre DELAAGE wrote: >> Hello, >> Thanks for the feedback. >> >> So...are you saying that it is now working with MY patched 502 and >> NOT with the official 503 (except for the "not configured msg") ? >> >> Or, finally, are you saying that they work the same, my patched 502 >> and the official 503 ? >> >> Yours sincerely >> Pierre >> >> >> >> Le 31/08/2014 22:46, 541401(a)gmail.com a écrit : >>> Hello Pierre, >>> >>> Today I downloaded the file you sent. I installed 5.03 on the server >>> (replacing 4.35), copied your 5.02 executable over the 5.03 exe. >>> >>> I then copied the 4.35 conf file into the 5.03 directory and finally >>> I installed and started the service. The service installed and ran, >>> but there was a message on the notification window saying it was not >>> configured. >>> >>> HOWEVER, I believe that message was wrong because the service works >>> just fine. I was able to send email from the Event log, through the >>> Windows virtual SMTP server and finally on through a gmail account! >>> >>> I did have to uncheck the service option "allow to interact with >>> desktop" because Server 2008 R2 will not allow a service to interact >>> with the desktop. >>> >>> Thank you very much, I am sorry it took a couple of days to do this >>> and report back to you! >>> >>> >>> On 29.Aug.14 07:38, Pierre DELAAGE wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> have you tried the patched 502 version I sent you last week ? >>>> Regards >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> Le 28 août 2014 à 21:20, "541401(a)gmail.com" <541401(a)gmail.com> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> Hopefully you were smarter than I and didn't piss away several >>>>> hours trying to solve the issue before turning to this forum? I >>>>> felt kind of foolish for wasting so much time trying to fix it on >>>>> my own. >>>>> >>>>> On 28.Aug.14 10:50, WNSDEV wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I ran into the same problem with Stunnel 5.03 on Windows 7 and >>>>>> downgrading >>>>>> to V 4.35 fixed it. Is there a new version to address this issue >>>>>> going to >>>>>> be available at some point? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Pete >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: 541401(a)gmail.com [mailto:541401@gmail.com] >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:43 PM >>>>>> To: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org >>>>>> Subject: [stunnel-users] Stunnel Windows Server 2008 R2 >>>>>> >>>>>> I have installed stunnel 5.03 on Windows Server 2008 R2 X64. >>>>>> When I run it >>>>>> as an application it works perfectly. When I install and run the >>>>>> service, >>>>>> it starts but the start notice window, title bar, says Stunnel >>>>>> 5.03 win32 (not configured). It appears that the stunnel service >>>>>> is not >>>>>> reading the stunnel.conf. >>>>>> >>>>>> If anyone has any suggestions how I can successfully run stunnel >>>>>> as a >>>>>> service, I would be very appreciative. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> stunnel-users mailing list >>>>>> stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org >>>>>> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> stunnel-users mailing list >>>>>> stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org >>>>>> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> stunnel-users mailing list >>>>> stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org >>>>> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >

1 0