December 2012 - stunnel-users

protocols options clarification
by John A. Wallace 06 Dec '12

06 Dec '12

The Service Level Options of the manual includes the following points: protocol = proto application protocol to negotiate SSL (e.g. starttls or stls) protocol option should not be used with SSL encryption on a separate port. Currently supported protocols: CIFS Connect Etc.. However, in the listed protocols supported neither "starttls" or "stls" appears, even though they appear to be options as far as I can see from the above explanation. Am I missing something here, or should they be among those in the list, and can one use this setting: Protocol=starttls Also, I don't really understand what this statement is telling me: "protocol option should not be used with SSL encryption on a separate port." John A. Wallace

3 2

Re: [stunnel-users] protocols options clarification
by jw72253＠verizon.net 05 Dec '12

05 Dec '12

2 1

how to use My Own Signed Wildcard cert
by robbi3j 05 Dec '12

05 Dec '12

Can anyone help ... have looked through the forums but cannot get this to work I want to configure Stunnel to use my already signed wildcard cert how to I go about importing it ? .. i have the cert file with the private key attached which is password protected can anyone help as its driving me nuts ! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/how-to-use-My-Own-Signed-Wildcard-cert-tp34756779p347… Sent from the Stunnel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 3

Console-only version for Windows
by Clodo 03 Dec '12

03 Dec '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is a binary version of stunnel for Windows WITHOUT the gui, console/terminal only? I have some different problems with the GUI edition: - - Fail to read filename with spaces? - - If is already in execution and i run stunnel.exe with some other parameters, they are ignored and simply give the focus to the current instance, so issue with launching multiple instances. Why there isn't any console-only version, exacly like the standard linux distribution? The Cygwin version works great, but isn't portable, doesn't work without Cygwin environment. There are some big trouble about that, or simply doesn't exists the .mak project file? I'm also available to pay with a donation a build like that. I'm waiting for feedback. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEVAwUBUKPN8i/ixHrG0m4LAQLxdwf/RF1faK3tksXnl6qm8Bi6HIFaG72tmFMJ LwQuY0gJh7rYDJs3NUQwh4XczMqi+5a8/SRZFojSewI2WfeZgLuXC58iq5nkAULm quaEN5ynjen80RJ7MtGg9weoHcpV1kug5HKJUwYZLU0lp8CvEGNhl8sgGT/bCUS7 gzdfi1d3YohBbEn8XZZgmmUmp1oShY4dh47Sd4vVlzaL3WkxqNIasCJJCwWk7lUz dPuy8XCi6y+Aes1T2SF87GAwvdkr0FbPiN0GcCXGczZxNjOiGNGOwqaHnxDknibr kHoGU/vv1PKWU5AYGiryD/YiUt0nHC/7I7IKU3tFu3smmFR8BTOwKA== =lLyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 5